I was going to write a post critical of Uber and the other
transportation network companies (TNCs), but I have so much material and don’t
want to spend all the time needed to make a thorough job of it. Instead, I am
going to write a short summary, listing my criticism and citing links. I do
have a few positives; we’ll start with those, and move on to the negatives
which, I regret to say, are many.
The overall picture is in some
ways similar to that of Enron and Worldcom, firms which failed due to fraud. There
is, however, some hope that the TNCs will ultimately find a sustainable
business model.
The amount of money invested in the TNCs is staggering and the
losses are equally staggering. In the first three quarters of 2019 Uber lost
some 2.52 billion dollars. This is apparently a result of the appalling
gullibility of investors and the failure of the securities regulatory system.
The Positives
·
The TNCs provide a convenient and useful
service.
·
Their service is sometimes better than existing
taxi companies, which are usually local oligopolies. Perhaps, though, it would
be better to improve regulation of existing taxi companies.
·
During non-busy times, the service is
inexpensive.
·
In many areas, they provide the only useful,
moderately priced car services in the suburbs.
·
They provide work for drivers who don’t want to
or can’t work a fixed schedule.
·
The reliance on GPS navigation software rather
than extensively trained drivers also make it possible for people who lack
detailed knowledge of a city to work as drivers.
The Negatives
·
They have taken cab driving from a job
which pays a living wage to one that pays only a marginal wage.
·
They put more cars on the street,
creating pollution and congestion.
·
The TNC business model exposes drivers
to all the expenses and liabilities of providing the service, who are
ill-equipped to handle them. One bad ride or accident can bankrupt a driver or
put them out of work.
·
They are losing money hand over fist,
so they will eventually either change their business model or simply go under,
having destroyed many viable local businesses.
·
“Uber seems to have realized its only
path forward is cannibalizing existing public transit services - metro buses,
school buses, etc. Which isn’t good for anyone except a small handful of
investors.” - Robert Cruikshank
·
Uber, recognizing that their business
model depends ultimately on paying drivers even less, has deployed self-driving
cars without adequate safety testing. So far, one death has resulted.
·
Most TNC drivers cannot safely
transport children and often do not have the legally required safety devices
which would allow them to do so. Drivers sometimes do so anyway, putting
children at risk of injury or death, and the driver at risk of criminal charges
and bankruptcy.
·
The TNCs do not provide transportation
for wheelchair bound passengers, or passengers with severe disabilities and, at
the same time, are cutting into the profit margins of firms which do.
·
Their service is inadequate for many
disabled people. A problem has emerged with service dogs and wheelchair users.
It may be that drivers are obligated under the Americans with Disabilities Act
to transport both groups, but many drivers, concerned with protecting their
cars, do not wish to do so.
·
The TNCs are scofflaws, committing many
violations of local laws. In some cases they have gotten the laws changed to
allow them to operate. In other cases they simply operate in defiance of local
laws.
·
The unmarked cars and non-liveried
drivers make several new sorts of crime possible; this problem is exacerbated
by inadequate driver background checks.
·
Their driver and passenger ranking
system automates racism and sexism.
·
Uber in particular is notorious for
running a sexist and racist operation. Their original CEO, Travis Kalanik,
finally had to resign because of it.
·
Their pricing model is illegal under
most city taxi laws. The services raise their prices when demand is highest,
and they do so without limit, resulting in a service that leaves many customers
without transportation when they most need it.
Citations
The Biggest and Worst
“When compared to employment and population growth
and network capacity shifts (such as for a bus or bicycle lane), TNCs accounted
for approximately 50% of the change in congestion in San Francisco between 2010
and 2016, as indicated by three congestion measures: vehicle hours of delay,
vehicle miles travelled, and average speeds.” – “TNCs and Congestion.” San Francisco County Transportation
Authority, 2018
“Uber and Lyft drivers bear almost all of the
expense of operation, from vehicle cost and depreciation to gas, oil, cleaning,
and other maintenance. Numerous studies around the nation reveal that many
drivers face extreme financial hardship, often earning less than the minimum
wage after expenses are taken into account. Yet as the ride-hail companies woo
Wall Street investors, driver trip-level data and the companies’ own financial
reports reveal that both Uber and Lyft are pocketing a greater share of rider
payments, while drivers are earning less.” – “Uber/Lyft take more, pay drivers less.” Joshua Welter, App-Based Drivers
Association (Teamsters associated), May 2019
“Uber achieved many firsts, let's look back:
(1) broke a ton of laws, (2) killed someone with an AI-powered robot, (3) executive
threatened reporters, (4) can only realize its current valuation by firing all
its drivers, replacing them with computers. Happy Uber IPO day!” – Tweet by Christopher
Mims of the Wall Street Journal, quoted in “A brief history of Uber’s bumpy road to an
IPO.” Jonathan Shieber, TechCrunch,
May 2019. Tweet later deleted.
“An examination of Uber’s economics suggests
that it has no hope of ever earning sustainable urban car service profits in
competitive markets. Its costs are simply much higher than the market is
willing to pay, as its nine years of massive losses indicate. Uber not only
lacks powerful competitive advantages, but it is actually less efficient than
the competitors it has been driving out of business. – “Uber’s Path of Destruction.” Hubert Horan, American Affairs Journal
3, no. 2 (Summer 2019).
The Whole Megillah
Robert Cruickshank. “Robert Cruickshank
on Twitter: ‘Uber Seems to Have Realized Its Only Path Forward Is Cannibalizing
Existing Public Transit Services - Metro Buses, School Buses, Etc. Which Isn’t
Good for Anyone except a Small Handful of Investors. Https://T.Co/O5r4Q69HHL’ /
Twitter.” Twitter. Accessed June 9, 2019.
https://twitter.com/cruickshank/status/1116710458310848512.
Comments
Post a Comment