Amazon Offers PR As News

Newscaster Zach Rael (KOCO, Oklahoma City) tweets:
Just got an email from Amazon’s PR team with a pre-edited news story and script to run in our shows. They are selling this as giving our viewers an “inside look” at the company’s response to COVID-19

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"AI" and Productivity

[I keep bringing these up on Bluesky, so I think it’s time to gather them up and make a post out of them.] This is a collection of articles on the problems of “AI.” “AI”—really, various sorts of generative machine learning models—including generative large language models (gLLMs) and generative stable diffusion models (gSDMs) so far do not live up to the promises of their marketers. A computer you can talk to is one of the great dreams of computing, and the initial releases of transformer-model based chatbots seemed to live up to this. There have been long-standing qualms about this idea, most notably Dijkstra’s argument that the imprecision of natural language was an impediment to correct thinking about computation and to accurate computing. 1 Unfortunately, so far it appears that Dijkstra was correct; gLLMs and gSDMs are notorious for errors and they are not currently designed to indicate uncertainty to their users so that people confidently rely on their erroneous output. There ar...
Read more

Nuclear Fusion, "AI," and Big Science

Sam Altman, who runs OpenAI, is a major investor in a firm called Helion (unlocked Bloomberg article), which claims it will be producing electricity from nuclear fusion by 2028. This is the second version of this article; physicist Stefan Urbat wrote to inform me that after 60 years there has been progress in dealing with second-order instabilities.
Read more

Large Language Models and Software Quality Assurance

One of the comparisons I've seen in defense using LLM technology to generate code, is that we after all use compilers to generate code from high level languages. But compilers are by design predictable and if they are not predictable that is an error; LLMs are stochastic in nature and there is so far no reliable way to tell when they are in error without careful examination of their output. Currently no one knows how to make LLMs predictable. There is a second problem: If your coder never tells you, "You're wrong, that doesn't work" or, "I don't think that's what you want" you will never find errors in specification; that is as true with a human coder as an LLM. There seems no way to bound the errors of LLM-generated code. I'm not even sure how to measure the errors; testing does not, cannot, do this. As Dijkstra famously obseved, "Testing shows the presence, not the absence, of bugs." The problem shifts from "Is your code corr...
Read more